1.3: Conclusion: Speaking Beyond the Podium
Tiffany Petricini
Public speaking is more than a performance skill—it’s a way of participating in the shared work of making meaning in the world. Whether you are presenting research, rallying a community, telling a story, or engaging in dialogue across differences, the choices you make as a communicator shape how others think, feel, and act. Speaking beyond the podium means recognizing that your influence doesn’t end when the speech is over; your words ripple through conversations, decisions, and relationships long after they are spoken.
In this chapter, you explored why public speaking matters today, how communication functions in both everyday and formal contexts, and how technology—including AI—changes the way we create and share messages. You also began to see that effective speaking requires more than technique. It demands awareness of context, openness to dialogue, and the ability to adapt in a rapidly shifting media environment.
But skill alone is not enough. In a world where voices can be amplified, silenced, or reshaped by human and algorithmic forces, how we speak—and the values guiding those choices—matters as much as what we say. This brings us to the next step in our journey: exploring the ethics of communication. In the following chapter, we will ask: What does it mean to speak responsibly? How can we ensure our messages build understanding rather than division? And how can we navigate the opportunities and challenges of AI-mediated communication with integrity and care?
Because beyond the podium also means beyond ourselves, into the shared spaces where words meet the lives of others.
Key Takeaways
- Communication is more than speaking – it’s how we build relationships, share meaning, and shape the world around us.
- Beyond the podium means applying public speaking skills across everyday, civic, and digital contexts.
- Public messages often aim to inform, persuade, or inspire—and these purposes guide both content and delivery.
- Competent communicators adapt messages to audience, context, and purpose while balancing clarity, connection, and ethics.
- AI and algorithms can assist in message creation and delivery but also influence what gets seen, heard, or valued.
References:
Arnett, R. C., & Arneson, P. (1999). Dialogic civility in a cynical age: Community, hope, and interpersonal relationships. State University of New York Press.
Barnlund, D. C. (2013). A transactional model of communication. In J. Akin, A. Goldberg, G. Myers, & J. Stewart (Eds.), Language behavior (pp. 43–61). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110878752.43.
Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (1988). The study of communication as a science. Communication Research, 15(4), 464–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015004004.
Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Routledge.
Fritz, J. M. H. (2013). Professional civility: Communicative virtue at work. Peter Lang.
Fritz, J. M. H., Bell McManus, L. M., & Kearney, M. R. Communication ethics literacy: Dialogue and difference (3rd ed.). Kendall Hunt.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.
Schramm, W. (1954). How communication works. In W. Schramm (Ed.), The process and effects of mass communication (Vol. 3, pp. 26–38). University of Illinois Press.
Weaver, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
