2.5: Conclusion: Ethics Beyond the Podium
Janie Harden Fritz
Ethical public speaking is not simply a classroom requirement; it is a civic practice that shapes who you are as a communicator and as a member of society. The principles outlined in this chapter, like truthfulness, respect, responsibility, and accountability are not just abstract ideals. They are guides for navigating everyday choices, from how you cite sources in a presentation to how you speak out in moments of conflict or uncertainty. Beyond the podium, these decisions build credibility, strengthen relationships, and contribute to the trust that communities and organizations depend on.
As we move forward, remember that ethical speaking is not about perfection it . It is about awareness and intention. Each decision you make about language, evidence, or delivery carries weight, both in the immediate context and in the broader world. Practicing ethics in small, everyday ways prepares you to respond with integrity when larger challenges arise.
In the next chapter, we shift from what is right to how to speak with strength. Confidence is the bridge between ethical intention and effective delivery. By combining ethical responsibility with confident expression, you will not only speak responsibly but also speak in ways that inspire others to listen and act.
Key Takeaways
- Ethics is the hidden foundation of all communication—every choice in public speaking rests on intent, means, and ends.
- The Ethics Pyramid helps speakers evaluate decisions step by step: ask if your purpose, methods, and outcomes are ethical.
- The NCA Credo for Ethical Communication provides guiding principles like truthfulness, respect, responsibility, and freedom of expression.
- Plagiarism and misinformation damage speaker credibility and erode public trust; citing sources and practicing transparency are essential.
- Free speech is a right paired with responsibility—ethical speakers balance expression with accountability for consequences.
- AI tools do not remove responsibility; speakers must verify, edit, and ensure fairness when using technology in communication.
- Beyond the classroom, ethical communication strengthens communities, workplaces, and democracy by promoting honesty, clarity, and respect.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
Arneson, P., & Dewberry, D. R. (2006). Mapping free speech scholarship in the communication discipline: 1969-2006. Free Speech Yearbook, 43, 199–228. https://doi.org /10.1080/08997225.2006.10556337
Arnett, R. C., Bell McManus, L. M., & McKendree, A. G. (2018). Conflict between persons: The origins of leadership (2nd ed.). Kendall Hunt.
Fawzy, F. (2016, July 19). From speeches to Ph.D.’s: Politicians called out for copying. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/19/politics/politicians-plagiarism.
Freedom of speech. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s dictionary of law. Retrieved from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary .reference.com/browse/freedom%20of%20speech.
Fritz, J. M. H. (2018). Communication ethics. In N. Snow (Ed.), Oxford handbook of virtue (pp. 700–721). Oxford University Press.
Fritz, J. M. H., Bell McManus, L. M., & Kearney, M. R (2023). Communication ethics literacy: Dialogue and difference (3rd ed.). Kendall Hunt.
Johannesen, R. L. (2001). Communication ethics: Centrality, trends, and controversies. Communication Yearbook, 25, 201–235.
Jungherr, A., & Schroeder, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the public arena. Communication Theory, 33, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad006.
Laster, J. (2010, Feb. 22). Malone U. president steps down amid plagiarism accusations. Chronicle of Higher Education. (https://www.chronicle.com/article/malone-u-president-steps-down-amid-plagiarism-accusations/).
Lucas, S. E., & Stob, P. (2020). The art of public speaking (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
McCroskey, J. C., Wrench, J. S., & Richmond, V. P. (2003). Principles of public speaking. The College Network.
Neu, J. L. (2025). Overcoming social polarization: An exploration of deliberative democracy, communication ethics, and post-truth America. Lexington.
National Archives and Records Administration. (2011). Bill of rights transcription. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html.
Pekka Isotalus, M. E., & Karppinen, K. (2025). Artificial Intelligence as a feedback provider in practicing public speaking. Communication Teacher, 39, 78–85. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.wayne.edu/10.1080/17404622.2024.2407910.
Pinchevsky, A., Buzzanell, P. M., & Hannan, J. (Eds.) (2025). Handbook of communication ethics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Pollino, M. A., Powell, E. A., & McCormick, M. L. (2025). Generative AI and the public speaking course: A critical communication pedagogy approach. Communication Teacher, 39, 71–77. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.wayne.edu/10.1080/17404622.2024.2396514.
Shiffrin, S. H. (1999). Dissent, injustice and the meanings of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supreme Court of the United States. (2007). Syllabus: Morse et al. v. Frederick. No. 06–278. Argued March 19, 2007–Decided June 25, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/06-278.pdf.
Tilley, E. (2005). The ethics pyramid: Making ethics unavoidable in the public relations process. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 20, 305–320.
Tong, S. T., DeTone, A., Frederick, A., & Odebiyi, S. (2025). What are we telling our students about AI? An exploratory analysis of university instructors’ generative AI syllabi policies. Communication Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2025.2477479.
Whitford, E. (2021, October 4). University president charged with plagiarism. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/10/05/west-liberty-president-plagiarized-several-speeches.
