Chapter 8.2 – How Perfectly Competitive Firms Make Output Decisions
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Calculate profits by comparing total revenue and total cost
- Identify profits and losses with the average cost curve
- Explain the shutdown point
- Determine the price at which a firm should continue producing in the short run
A perfectly competitive firm has only one major decision to make—namely, what quantity to produce. To understand this, consider a different way of writing out the basic definition of profit:
[latex][/latex] \[Profit=\;Total\;revenue-\;Total\;cost\]
\[=\left (\;Price\right )\left (\;Quantity\;produced\right )-\left (\;Average\;cost\right )\left (\;Quantity\;produced\right )\]
Since a perfectly competitive firm must accept the price for its output as determined by the product’s market demand and supply, it cannot choose the price it charges. This is already determined in the profit equation, and so the perfectly competitive firm can sell any number of units at exactly the same price. It implies that the firm faces a perfectly elastic demand curve for its product: buyers are willing to buy any number of units of output from the firm at the market price. When the perfectly competitive firm chooses what quantity to produce, then this quantity—along with the prices prevailing in the market for output and inputs—will determine the firm’s total revenue, total costs, and ultimately, level of profits.
Determining the Highest Profit by Comparing Total Revenue and Total Cost
A perfectly competitive firm can sell as large a quantity as it wishes, as long as it accepts the prevailing market price. The formula above shows that total revenue depends on the quantity sold and the price charged. If the firm sells a higher quantity of output, then total revenue will increase. If the market price of the product increases, then total revenue also increases whatever the quantity of output sold. As an example of how a perfectly competitive firm decides what quantity to produce, consider the case of a small farmer who produces raspberries and sells them frozen for $4 per pack. Sales of one pack of raspberries will bring in $4, two packs will be $8, three packs will be $12, and so on. If, for example, the price of frozen raspberries doubles to $8 per pack, then sales of one pack of raspberries will be $8, two packs will be $16, three packs will be $24, and so on.
Table 8.1 graphically shows total revenue and total costs for the raspberry farm, also appear in Figure 8.1. The horizontal axis shows the quantity of frozen raspberries produced in packs. The vertical axis shows both total revenue and total costs, measured in dollars. The total cost curve intersects with the vertical axis at a value that shows the level of fixed costs, and then slopes upward. All these cost curves follow the same characteristics as the curves that we covered in the Production, Costs and Industry Structure chapter.
| Quantity (Q) |
Total Cost (T.C.) |
Total Revenue (T.R.) |
Profit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | $62 | $0 | −$62 |
| 10 | $90 | $40 | −$50 |
| 20 | $110 | $80 | −$30 |
| 30 | $126 | $120 | −$6 |
| 40 | $138 | $160 | $22 |
| 50 | $150 | $200 | $50 |
| 60 | $165 | $240 | $75 |
| 70 | $190 | $280 | $90 |
| 80 | $230 | $320 | $90 |
| 90 | $296 | $360 | $64 |
| 100 | $400 | $400 | $0 |
| 110 | $550 | $440 | $−110 |
| 120 | $715 | $480 | $−235 |
Table 8.1 Total Cost and Total Revenue at the Raspberry Farm (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
Based on its total revenue and total cost curves, a perfectly competitive firm like the raspberry farm can calculate the quantity of output that will provide the highest level of profit. At any given quantity, total revenue minus total cost will equal profit. One way to determine the most profitable quantity to produce is to see at what quantity total revenue exceeds total cost by the largest amount. Figure 8.2 shows total revenue, total cost and profit using the data from Table 8.1. The vertical gap between total revenue and total cost is profit, for example, at Q = 60, T.R. = 240 and T.C. = 165. The difference is 75, which is the height of the profit curve at that output level. The firm doesn’t make a profit at every level of output. In this example, total costs will exceed total revenues at output levels from 0 to approximately 30, and so over this range of output, the firm will be making losses. At output levels from 40 to 100, total revenues exceed total costs, so the firm is earning profits. However, at any output greater than 100, total costs again exceed total revenues and the firm is making increasing losses. Total profits appear in the final column of Table 8.1. Maximum profit occurs at an output between 70 and 80, when profit equals $90.
A higher price would mean that total revenue would be higher for every quantity sold. A lower price would mean that total revenue would be lower for every quantity sold. What happens if the price drops low enough so that the total revenue line is completely below the total cost curve; that is, at every level of output, total costs are higher than total revenues? In this instance, the best the firm can do is to suffer losses. However, a profit-maximizing firm will prefer the quantity of output where total revenues come closest to total costs and thus where the losses are smallest.
(Later we will see that sometimes it will make sense for the firm to close, rather than stay in operation producing output.)
Comparing Marginal Revenue and Marginal Costs
The approach that we described in the previous section, using total revenue and total cost, is not the only approach to determining the profit maximizing level of output. In this section, we provide an alternative approach which uses marginal revenue and marginal cost.
Firms often do not have the necessary data they need to draw a complete total cost curve for all levels of production. They cannot be sure of what total costs would look like if they, say, doubled production or cut production in half, because they have not tried it. Instead, firms experiment. They produce a slightly greater or lower quantity and observe how it affects profits. In economic terms, this practical approach to maximizing profits means examining how changes in production affect marginal revenue and marginal cost.
Figure 8.2 presents the marginal revenue and marginal cost curves based on the total revenue and total cost in Table 8.1. The marginal revenue curve shows the additional revenue gained from selling one more unit. As mentioned before, a firm in perfect competition faces a perfectly elastic demand curve for its product—that is, the firm’s demand curve is a horizontal line drawn at the market price level. This also means that the firm’s marginal revenue curve is the same as the firm’s demand curve: Every time a consumer demands one more unit, the firm sells one more unit and revenue increases by exactly the same amount equal to the market price. In this example, every time the firm sells a pack of frozen raspberries, the firm’s revenue increases by $4. Table 8.2 shows an example of this. This condition only holds for price-taking firms in perfect competition where:
\[marginal\;revenue=\;price\]
The formula for marginal revenue is:
\[marginal\;revenue=\frac{\;change\;in\;total\;revenue}{\;change\;in\;quantity}\]
| Price | Quantity | Total Revenue | Marginal Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4 | 1 | $4 | – |
| $4 | 2 | $8 | $4 |
| $4 | 3 | $12 | $4 |
| $4 | 4 | $16 | $4 |
Notice that marginal revenue does not change as the firm produces more output. That is because, under perfect competition, the price is determined through the interaction of supply and demand in the market and does not change as the farmer produces more (keeping in mind that, due to the relative small size of each firm, increasing their supply has no impact on the total market supply where price is determined).
Since a perfectly competitive firm is a price taker, it can sell whatever quantity it wishes at the market-determined price. We calculate marginal cost, the cost per additional unit sold, by dividing the change in total cost by the change in quantity. The formula for marginal cost is:
\[marginal\;cost=\frac{\;change\;in\;total\;cost}{\;change\;in\;quantity}\]
Ordinarily, marginal cost changes as the firm produces a greater quantity.
In the raspberry farm example, in Figure 8.2, Figure 8.3 and Table 8.2, marginal cost at first declines as production increases from 10 to 20 to 30 to 40 packs of raspberries—which represents the area of increasing marginal returns that is not uncommon at low levels of production. At some point, though, marginal costs start to increase, displaying the typical pattern of diminishing marginal returns. If the firm is producing at a quantity where M.R. > M.C., like 40 or 50 packs of raspberries, then it can increase profit by increasing output because the marginal revenue is exceeding the marginal cost. If the firm is producing at a quantity where M.R. > M.C., like 90 or 100 packs, then it can increase profit by reducing output because the reductions in marginal cost will exceed the reductions in marginal revenue. The firm’s profit-maximizing choice of output will occur where MR = MC (or at a choice close to that point).
| Quantity | Total Cost | Marginal Cost | Total Revenue | Marginal Revenue | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | $62 | – | $0 | $4 | -$62 |
| 10 | $90 | $2.80 | $40 | $4 | -$50 |
| 20 | $110 | $2.00 | $80 | $4 | -$30 |
| 30 | $126 | $1.60 | $120 | $4 | -$6 |
| 40 | $138 | $1.20 | $160 | $4 | $22 |
| 50 | $150 | $1.20 | $200 | $4 | $50 |
| 60 | $165 | $1.50 | $240 | $4 | $75 |
| 70 | $190 | $2.50 | $280 | $4 | $90 |
| 80 | $230 | $4.00 | $320 | $4 | $90 |
| 90 | $296 | $6.60 | $360 | $4 | $64 |
| 100 | $400 | $10.40 | $400 | $4 | $0 |
| 110 | $550 | $15.00 | $440 | $4 | -$110 |
| 120 | $715 | $16.50 | $480 | $4 | -$235 |
In this example, the marginal revenue and marginal cost curves cross at a price of $4 and a quantity of 80 produced. If the farmer started out producing at a level of 60, and then experimented with increasing production to 70, marginal revenues from the increase in production would exceed marginal costs—and so profits would rise. The farmer has an incentive to keep producing. At a level of output of 80, marginal cost and marginal revenue are equal so profit doesn’t change. If the farmer then experimented further with increasing production from 80 to 90, he would find that marginal costs from the increase in production are greater than marginal revenues, and so profits would decline.
The profit-maximizing choice for a perfectly competitive firm will occur at the level of output where marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost—that is, where MR = MC. This occurs at Q = 80 in the figure.
WORK IT OUT
Does Profit Maximization Occur at a Range of Output or a Specific Level of Output?
Table 8.1 shows that maximum profit occurs at any output level between 70 and 80 units of output. But MR = MC occurs only at 80 units of output. How can do we explain this slight discrepancy? As long as MR > MC. a profit-seeking firm should keep expanding production. Expanding production into the zone where MR < MC reduces economic profits. It’s true that profit is the same at Q = 70 and Q = 80, but it’s only when the firm goes beyond that that see that profits fall. Thus, MR = MC is the signal to stop expanding, so that is the level of output they should target.
Profits and Losses with the Average Cost Curve
Does maximizing profit (producing where MR = MC) imply an actual economic profit? The answer depends on the relationship between price and average total cost, which is the average profit or profit margin. If the market price is higher than the firm’s average cost of production for that quantity produced, then the profit margin is positive and the firm will earn profits. Conversely, if the market price is lower than the average cost of production, the profit margin is negative and the firm will suffer losses. You might think that, in this situation, the firm may want to shut down immediately. Remember, however, that the firm has already paid for fixed costs, such as equipment, so it may continue to produce for a while and incur a loss. Table 8.4 continues the raspberry farm example. Figure 8.4 illustrates the three possible scenarios: (a) where price intersects marginal cost at a level above the average cost curve, (b) where price intersects marginal cost at a level equal to the average cost curve, and (c) where price intersects marginal cost at a level below the average cost curve.
\[profit=\;total\;revenue-\;total\;cost\]
\[=\left (85\right )\left (\$85\right )-\left (85\right )\left (\$3.50\right )\]
\[=\$170\]
Or, we can calculate it as:
\[profit=\left (\;price-\;average\;cost\right )\ast \;quantity\]
\[=\left (\$5.00-\$3.50\right )\ast 85\]
\[=\$170\]
Now consider Figure 8.4 (b), where the price has fallen to $2.75 for a pack of frozen raspberries. Again, the perfectly competitive firm will choose the level of output where Price = MR = MC, but in this case, the quantity produced will be 75. At this price and output level, where the marginal cost curve is crossing the average cost curve, the price the firm receives is exactly equal to its average cost of production. We call this the break even point.The farm’s total revenue at this price will be shown by the large shaded rectangle from the origin over to a quantity of 75 packs (the base) up to point E (the height), over to the price of $2.75, and back to the origin. The height of the average cost curve at Q = 75, i.e. point E, shows the average cost of producing this quantity. Total costs will be the quantity of 75 times the average cost of $2.75, which is shown by the area of the rectangle from the origin to a quantity of 75, up to point E, over to the vertical axis and down to the origin. It should be clear that the rectangles for total revenue and total cost are the same. Thus, the firm is making zero profit. The calculations are as follows:
\[profit=\;total\;revenue-\;total\;cost\]
\[=\left (75\right )\left (\$2.75\right )-\left (75\right )\left (\$2.75\right )\]
\[=0\]
Or, we can calculate it as:
\[profit=\left (\;price-\;average\;cost\right )\ast \;quantity\]
\[=\left (\$2.75-\$2.75\right )\ast 75\]
\[=0\]In Figure 8.4 (c), the market price has fallen still further to $2.00 for a pack of frozen raspberries. At this price, marginal revenue intersects marginal cost at a quantity of 65. The farm’s total revenue at this price will be shown by the large shaded rectangle from the origin over to a quantity of 65 packs (the base) up to point E” (the height), over to the price of $2, and back to the origin. The average cost of producing 65 packs is shown by Point C” or shows the average cost of producing 50 packs is about $2.73. Total costs will be the quantity of 65 times the average cost of $2.73, which the area of the rectangle from the origin to a quantity of 50, up to point C”, over to the vertical axis and down to the origin shows. It should be clear from examining the two rectangles that total revenue is less than total cost. Thus, the firm is losing money and the loss (or negative profit) will be the rose-shaded rectangle.The calculations are:
\[profit=\left (\;total\;revenue-\;total\;cost\right )\]
\[=\left (65\right )\left (\$2.00\right )-\left (65\right )\left (\$2.73\right )\]
\[=-\$47.45\]
Or:
\[profit=\left (\;price-\;average\;cost\right )\ast \;quantity\]
\[=\left (\$2.00-\$2.73\right )\ast 65\]
\[=-\$47.45\]
If the market price that perfectly competitive firm receives leads it to produce at a quantity where the price is greater than average cost, the firm will earn profits. If the price the firm receives causes it to produce at a quantity where price equals average cost, which occurs at the minimum point of the AC curve, then the firm earns zero profits. Finally, if the price the firm receives leads it to produce at a quantity where the price is less than average cost, the firm will earn losses. Table 8.3 summarizes this.
| If… | Then… |
|---|---|
| Price > A.T.C. | Firm earns an economic profit |
| Price = ATC | Firm earns zero economic profit |
| Price < ATC | Firm earns a loss |
CLEAR IT UP
Which intersection should a firm choose?
At a price of $2, MR intersects MC at two points: Q = 20 and Q = 65. It never makes sense for a firm to choose a level of output on the downward sloping part of the MC curve, because the profit is lower (the loss is bigger). Thus, the correct choice of output is Q = 65.
The Shutdown Point
The possibility that a firm may earn losses raises a question: Why can the firm not avoid losses by shutting down and not producing at all? The answer is that shutting down can reduce variable costs to zero, but in the short run, the firm has already paid for fixed costs. As a result, if the firm produces a quantity of zero, it would still make losses because it would still need to pay for its fixed costs. Therefore when a firm is experiencing losses, it must face a question: should it continue producing or should it shut down?
As an example, consider the situation of the Yoga Center, which has signed a contract to rent space that costs $10,000 per month. If the firm decides to operate, its marginal costs for hiring yoga teachers is $15,000 for the month. If the firm shuts down, it must still pay the rent, but it would not need to hire labor. Table 8.4 shows three possible scenarios. In the first scenario, the Yoga Center does not have any clients, and therefore does not make any revenues, in which case it faces losses of $10,000 equal to the fixed costs. In the second scenario, the Yoga Center has clients that earn the center revenues of $10,000 for the month, but ultimately experiences losses of $15,000 due to having to hire yoga instructors to cover the classes. In the third scenario, the Yoga Center earns revenues of $20,000 for the month, but experiences losses of $5,000.
In all three cases, the Yoga Center loses money. In all three cases, when the rental contract expires in the long run, assuming revenues do not improve, the firm should exit this business. In the short run, though, the decision varies depending on the level of losses and whether the firm can cover its variable costs. In scenario 1, the center does not have any revenues, so hiring yoga teachers would increase variable costs and losses, so it should shut down and only incur its fixed costs. In scenario 2, the center’s losses are greater because it does not make enough revenue to offset the increased variable costs, so it should shut down immediately and only incur its fixed costs. If price is below the minimum average variable cost, the firm must shut down. In contrast, in scenario 3 the revenue that the center can earn is high enough that the losses diminish when it remains open, so the center should remain open in the short run.
| Scenario 1 |
|---|
| If the center shuts down now, revenues are zero but it will not incur any variable costs and would only need to pay fixed costs of $10,000. |
| \[profit=\;total\;revenue-\left (\;fixed\;costs+\;variable\;cost\right )\] \[=0-\$10,000\] \[=-\$10,000\] |
Table 8.4.1 Should the Yoga Center Shut Down Now or Later? (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
| Scenario 2 |
|---|
| The center earns revenues of $10,000, and variable costs are $15,000. The center should shut down now. |
| \[profit=\;total\;revenue-\left (\;fixed\;costs+\;variable\;cost\right )\] \[=\$10,000-\left (\$10,000+\$15,000\right )\] \[=-\$15,000\] |
Table 8.4.2 Should the Yoga Center Shut Down Now or Later? (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
The center earns revenues of $20,000, and variable costs are $15,000. The center should continue in business.
| Scenario 3 |
|---|
| The center earns revenues of $20,000, and variable costs are $15,000. The center should continue in business. |
| \[profit=\;total\;revenue-\left (\;fixed\;costs+\;variable\;cost\right )\] \[=\$20,000-\left (\$10,000+\$15,000\right )\] \[=-\$5,000\] |
Table 8.4.3 Should the Yoga Center Shut Down Now or Later? (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
Figure 8.5 illustrates the lesson that remaining open requires the price to exceed the firm’s average variable cost. When the firm is operating below the break-even point, where price equals average cost, it is operating at a loss so it faces two options: continue to produce and lose money or shutdown. Which option is preferable? The one that loses the least money is the best choice.
At a price of $2.00 per pack, as Figure 8.5 (a) illustrates, if the farm stays in operation it will produce at a level of 65 packs of raspberries, and it will make losses of $47.45 (as explained earlier). The alternative would be to shut down and lose all the fixed costs of $62.00. Since losing $47.45 is preferable to losing $62.00, the profit-maximizing (or in this case the loss minimizing) choice is to stay in operation. The key reason is that price is above average variable cost. This means that at the current price the farm can pay all its variable costs, and have some revenue left over to pay some of the fixed costs. So the loss represents the part of the fixed costs the farm can’t pay, which is less than the entire fixed costs. However, if the price declined to $1.50 per pack, as Figure 8.6 shows (b), and if the firm applied its rule of producing where P = MR = MC, it would produce a quantity of 60. This price is below average variable cost for this level of output. If the farmer cannot pay workers (the variable costs), then it has to shut down. At this price and output, total revenues would be $90 (quantity of 60 times price of $1.50) and total cost would be $165, for overall losses of $75. If the farm shuts down, it must pay only its fixed costs of $62, so shutting down is preferable to selling at a price of $1.50 per pack.
Looking at Table 8.5, if the price falls below about $1.65, the minimum average variable cost, the firm must shut down.
| Quantity Q |
Average Variable Cost AVC |
Average Cost AC |
Marginal Cost MC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | – | – | – |
| 10 | $2.80 | $9.00 | $2.80 |
| 20 | $2.40 | $5.50 | $2.00 |
| 30 | $2.13 | $4.20 | $1.60 |
| 40 | $1.90 | $3.45 | $1.20 |
| 50 | $1.76 | $3.00 | $1.20 |
| 60 | $1.72 | $2.75 | $1.50 |
| 70 | $1.83 | $2.71 | $2.50 |
| 80 | $2.10 | $2.88 | $4.00 |
| 90 | $2.60 | $3.29 | $6.60 |
| 100 | $3.38 | $4.00 | $10.40 |
| 110 | $4.44 | $5.00 | $15.00 |
| 120 | $5.44 | $5.96 | $31.50 |
The intersection of the average variable cost curve and the marginal cost curve, which shows the price below which the firm would lack enough revenue to cover its variable costs, is called the shutdown point. If the perfectly competitive firm faces a market price above the shutdown point, then the firm is at least covering its average variable costs. At a price above the shutdown point, the firm is also making enough revenue to cover at least a portion of fixed costs, so it should limp ahead even if it is making losses in the short run, since at least those losses will be smaller than if the firm shuts down immediately and incurs a loss equal to total fixed costs. However, if the firm is receiving a price below the price at the shutdown point, then the firm is not even covering its variable costs. In this case, staying open is making the firm’s losses larger, and it should shut down immediately. To summarize, if:
- price < minimum average variable cost, then firm shuts down
- price > minimum average variable cost, then firm stays in business
Short-Run Outcomes for Perfectly Competitive Firms
The average cost and average variable cost curves divide the marginal cost curve into three segments, as Figure 8.6 shows. At the market price, which the perfectly competitive firm accepts as given, the profit-maximizing firm chooses the output level where price or marginal revenue, which are the same thing for a perfectly competitive firm, is equal to marginal cost: P = MR = MC.
Marginal Cost and the Firm’s Supply Curve
For a perfectly competitive firm, the marginal cost curve is identical to the firm’s supply curve starting from the minimum point on the average variable cost curve. To understand why this perhaps surprising insight holds true, first think about what the supply curve means. A firm checks the market price and then looks at its supply curve to decide what quantity to produce. Now, think about what it means to say that a firm will maximize its profits by producing at the quantity where P = MC. This rule means that the firm checks the market price, and then looks at its marginal cost to determine the quantity to produce—and makes sure that the price is greater than the minimum average variable cost. In other words, the marginal cost curve above the minimum point on the average variable cost curve becomes the firm’s supply curve.
As we discussed in the chapter on Demand and Supply, many of the reasons that supply curves shift relate to underlying changes in costs. For example, a lower price of key inputs or new technologies that reduce production costs cause supply to shift to the right. In contrast, bad weather or added government regulations can add to costs of certain goods in a way that causes supply to shift to the left. We can also interpret these shifts in the firm’s supply curve as shifts of the marginal cost curve. A shift in costs of production that increases marginal costs at all levels of output—and shifts MC upward and to the left—will cause a perfectly competitive firm to produce less at any given market price. Conversely, a shift in costs of production that decreases marginal costs at all levels of output will shift MC downward and to the right and as a result, a competitive firm will choose to expand its level of output at any given price. The following Work It Out feature will walk you through an example.
WORK IT OUT
At What Price Should the Firm Continue Producing in the Short Run?
To determine the short-run economic condition of a firm in perfect competition, follow the steps outlined below. Use the data in Table 8.6.
| Q | P | TFC | TVC | TC | AVC | ATC | MC | TR | Profits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | $28 | $20 | $0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 1 | $28 | $20 | $20 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | $28 | $20 | $25 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 3 | $28 | $20 | $35 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 4 | $28 | $20 | $52 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5 | $28 | $20 | $80 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Table 8.6 (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
Step 1. Determine the cost structure for the firm. For a given total fixed costs and variable costs, calculate total cost, average variable cost, average total cost, and marginal cost. Follow the formulas given in the Production, Costs, and Industry Structure chapter. These calculations are in Table 8.7.
| Q | P | TFC | TVC | TC (TFC+TVC) |
AVC (TVC/Q) |
ATC (TC/Q) |
MC (TC2−TC1)/ (Q2−Q1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | $28 | $20 | $0 | $20+$0=$20 | – | – | – |
| 1 | $28 | $20 | $20 | $20+$20=$40 | $20/1=$20.00 | $40/1=$40.00 | ($40−$20)/ (1−0)= $20 |
| 2 | $28 | $20 | $25 | $20+$25=$45 | $25/2=$12.50 | $45/2=$22.50 | ($45−$40)/ (2−1)= $5 |
| 3 | $28 | $20 | $35 | $20+$35=$55 | $35/3=$11.67 | $55/3=$18.33 | ($55−$45)/ (3−2)= $10 |
| 4 | $28 | $20 | $52 | $20+$52=$72 | $52/4=$13.00 | $72/4=$18.00 | ($72−$55)/ (4−3)= $17 |
| 5 | $28 | $20 | $80 | $20+$80=$100 | $80/5=$16.00 | $100/5=$20.00 | ($100−$72)/ (5−4)= $28 |
Table 8.7 Data for Step 1 (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
Step 2. Determine the market price that the firm receives for its product. Since the firm in perfect competition is a price taker, the market price is constant With the given price, calculate total revenue as equal to price multiplied by quantity for all output levels produced. In this example, the given price is $28. You can see that in the second column of Table 8.8.
| Quantity | Price | Total Revenue (P × Q) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | $28 | $28×0=$0 |
| 1 | $28 | $28×1=$28 |
| 2 | $28 | $28×2=$56 |
| 3 | $28 | $28×3=$84 |
| 4 | $28 | $28×4=$112 |
| 5 | $28 | $28×5=$140 |
Table 8.8 Data for Step 2 (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
Step 3. Calculate profits as total cost subtracted from total revenue, as Table 8.9 shows.
| Quantity | Total Revenue | Total Cost | Profits (TR−TC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | $0 | $20 | $0−$20=−$20 |
| 1 | $28 | $40 | $28−$40=−$12 |
| 2 | $56 | $45 | $56−$45=$11 |
| 3 | $84 | $55 | $84−$55=$29 |
| 4 | $112 | $72 | $112−$72=$40 |
| 5 | $140 | $100 | $140−$100=$40 |
Table 8.9 Data for Step 3 (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
Step 4. To find the profit-maximizing output level, look at the Marginal Cost column (at every output level produced), as Table 8.10 shows, and determine where it is equal to the market price. The output level where price equals the marginal cost is the output level that maximizes profits.
| Q | P | TFC | TVC | TC | AVC | ATC | MC | TR | Profits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | $28 | $20 | $0 | $20 | – | – | – | $0 | −$20 |
| 1 | $28 | $20 | $20 | $40 | $20.00 | $40.00 | $20 | $28 | −$12 |
| 2 | $28 | $20 | $25 | $45 | $12.50 | $22.50 | $5 | $56 | $11 |
| 3 | $28 | $20 | $35 | $55 | $11.67 | $18.33 | $10 | $84 | $29 |
| 4 | $28 | $20 | $52 | $72 | $13.00 | $18.00 | $17 | $112 | $40 |
| 5 | $28 | $20 | $80 | $100 | $16.40 | $20.40 | $28 | $140 | $40 |
Table 8.10 Data for Step 4 (Source: https://openstax.org/books/principles-microeconomics-2e/pages/1-introduction)(CC BY 4.0)
Step 5. Once you have determined the profit-maximizing output level (in this case, output quantity 5), you can look at the amount of profits made (in this case, $40).
Step 6. If the firm is making economic losses, the firm needs to determine whether it produces the output level where price equals marginal revenue and equals marginal cost or it shuts down and only incurs its fixed costs.
Step 7. For the output level where marginal revenue is equal to marginal cost, check if the market price is greater than the average variable cost of producing that output level.
If [latex]P > AVC[/latex] but [latex]P < ATC[/latex], then the firm continues to produce in the short-run, making economic losses. If [latex]P < AVC[/latex], then the firm stops producing and only incurs its fixed costs. In this example, the price of $28 is greater than the AVC ($16.40) of producing 5 units of output, so the firm continues producing.